subject
World Languages, 24.07.2021 17:30 abilovessoftball

I.दि ए गए गद्यांश पढ़कर प्रश्नों का उत्तर दीजि ए : Read the passage and answer the questions given below. एक थेपडिं डित जी और एक थींपडिं डिताइन । वेएक छोटे - सेगाँव मेंरहतेथे। पडिं डित जी परूे कट्टरपथं ी थे, अपनेको सबसेऊँचा मानतेथे। ब्राह्मण कुल मेंपदै ा होनेका उनके मन मेंबड़ा अभि मान था। लेकि न उनकी पत्नी सीधी-सादी थीं। उनके मन मेंऊँच-नीच और छुआछूत का भाव बि ल्कुल नहीं था। वेसबके साथ मि ल-जलु कर रहती थीं। इसी कारण वेगाँव मेंलोकप्रि य भी थीं। ग्रामीण उनका सम्मान करतेथे। A.उत्तर दीजि ए : Answer the following (2) 1.पडिं डित और पडिं डिताइन कहाँरहतेथे? 2.ग्रामीण कि सका सम्मान करतेथे ?​

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on World Languages

question
World Languages, 22.06.2019 11:30
Where is the equilibrium point on this graph
Answers: 2
question
World Languages, 24.06.2019 11:10
Rick read the following argument: although the gas helium is the second most abundant element in the known universe, its supplies on earth are limited. most helium comes either from mining minerals or as a byproduct of natural gas. although helium is in low supply, the demand for it is quite high. it can be used for a variety of medical purposes, including the treatment of breathing problems such as asthma. helium also has heart and nerve protective properties, and doctors are beginning to use it in surgery. yet current laws make recycling helium unprofitable. for the sake of our health, those laws must change. which statement would be the most appropriate in a conclusion to this argument? why? a. “these laws are unlikely to change, so we must take steps to manufacture helium on our own.” this statement makes the logical leap that if we can't recycle helium, we should create it. b. “until human disease is a thing of the past, we cannot support laws that put helium supplies at risk.” this restates the claim of this argument, which is that we should do everything in our power to treat human diseases. c. “if there is any practical use for helium other than medicine, laws should change to protect current supplies of the gas.” this sentence summarizes one of the major points of the argument, which is that helium reserves are in low supply. d. “human health depends on helium, and therefore it is necessary to change the laws that make it hard to acquire.” this restates the claim of the argument and also summarizes the supporting evidence that illnesses can be treated by helium.
Answers: 1
question
World Languages, 26.06.2019 05:30
Language arts: then the junk would have life. which is demonstrated in this sentence? question 3 options: 1. simile 2.metaphor 3.personification 4.connotative language
Answers: 1
question
World Languages, 27.06.2019 21:00
The signs answer, discuss, struggle, and conflict have what in common. movement location handshape palm orientation
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
I.दि ए गए गद्यांश पढ़कर प्रश्नों का उत्तर दीजि ए : Read the passage and answer the questions given b...
Questions
question
Physics, 27.11.2019 10:31
question
English, 27.11.2019 10:31
question
History, 27.11.2019 10:31
Questions on the website: 13722360