1. Justifique o título do texto. 2. Depois de referir o desfecho do caso de “uma caixa de águas pluviais”, por que acrescenta o autor do
texto que “[se] tratou de duas companhias portuguesas”?
3. Explique por que razão é que o caso da Império é “espantoso”
4. Explique por palavras suas o sentido das seguintes palavras e/ou expressões, atendendo ao contexto
específico em que ocorrem
4.1. « politicamente incorreta, socialmente injusta, economicamente desfasada »
4.2. «avençados»
4.3. «paradigmático»
4.4. «dirimir»
4.5. «leonino»
5. “A argúcia de Eça foi tal que ainda hoje os seus escritos mantêm a atualidade.”
Concorda com a observação anterior, segundo a qual a argúcia de Eça se mantém atual?
Justifique, apresentando os seus argumentos em oito / dez linhas (no máximo) .

Read this excerpt from the call of the wild by jack london. the encouragement buck gave the rebels led them into all kinds of petty misdemeanors. no more was spitz a leader greatly to be feared. the old awe departed, and they grew equal to challenging his authority. pike robbed him of half a fish one night, and gulped it down under the protection of buck. another night dub and joe fought spitz and made him forego the punishment they deserved. and even billee, the good-natured, was less good-natured, and whined not half so placatingly as in former days. buck never came near spitz without snarling and bristling menacingly. in fact, his conduct approached that of a bully, and he was given to swaggering up and down before spitz's very nose. who is the antagonist in this excerpt? buck is the antagonist because he has started a rebellion. spitz is the antagonist because the others are rebelling against his leadership. dub and joe are the antagonists because they attack spitz. billee is the antagonist because he refuses to cooperate with the others.

Money oweda. auditb. assetsc. capitald. liabilities

It’s ok to use materials without referencing them as long as they’re paraphrased in your own words. a. false b. true c. sometimes d. depends