Read this paragraph from Carmen’s argument: (Claim:) There should be a cap, or limit, on the salaries of professional athletes. (Reason:) Restricting the amount of money athletes can make will lead to various benefits for sports fans. (Reason:) Another benefit would be better competition at sporting events because team managers could focus more on acquiring athletes with special talents rather than on how much the player will cost. (Evidence:) If teams limit players’ salaries, they can reduce the cost of a ticket. (Evidence:) This would make games more affordable for fans.

How can Carmen improve the organization and clarity of her reasons and evidence?

A.
Rewrite the claim sentence to include the reasons.
B.
Add an explanation of how the evidence supports the reasons.
C.
Group each reason with the evidence and explanation that support it.
D.
Present all the reasons together at the beginning and then explain all the evidence.
Can someone please

The way in which Carmen can give greater organization and clarity to her reasons and evidence is:

In order to develop a more coherent text, which allows clearly identifying the reasons why teams must select a maximum cap on the salaries of their athletes, all the reasons must be mentioned in the first instance.

Once the reader has understood all the reasons for Carmen's statement, she should proceed to mention all the evidence together, not separately, since it gives the impression that they are isolated evidence when in fact they are correlated.

If you want to learn more about Presentation of Ideas, you can visit the following link: link

explanation: the line "to save the day, harry must get past a scary three-headed guard dog" from the summary best justifies the conclusion that harry potter and the sorcerer’s stone was influenced by ancient greek mythological literature. the three other choices had nothing to do with ancient greek literature - and the words "three-headed guard dog" are what makes that choice the correct answer.