subject
World Languages, 19.07.2019 05:10 gallegosarmanni

But this, but you – small, pitiful and twiggy – you put me down with wine, you blinded me. come back, odysseus, and i'll treat you well, praying the god of earthquake to befriend you – his son i am, for he by his avowal fathered me, and, if he will, he may heal me of this black wound – he and no other of all the happy gods or mortal men.' few words i shouted in reply to him: 'if i could take your life i would and take your time away, and hurl you down to hell! the god of earthquake could not heal you there! ' at this he stretched his hands out in his darkness toward the sky of stars, and prayed poseidon: 'o hear me, lord, blue girdler of the islands, if i am thine indeed, and thou art father: grant that odysseus, raider of cities, never see his home -the odyssey, homer what motivates cyclops to ask poseidon to interfere with odysseus’s journey home?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on World Languages

question
World Languages, 24.06.2019 11:10
Rick read the following argument: although the gas helium is the second most abundant element in the known universe, its supplies on earth are limited. most helium comes either from mining minerals or as a byproduct of natural gas. although helium is in low supply, the demand for it is quite high. it can be used for a variety of medical purposes, including the treatment of breathing problems such as asthma. helium also has heart and nerve protective properties, and doctors are beginning to use it in surgery. yet current laws make recycling helium unprofitable. for the sake of our health, those laws must change. which statement would be the most appropriate in a conclusion to this argument? why? a. “these laws are unlikely to change, so we must take steps to manufacture helium on our own.” this statement makes the logical leap that if we can't recycle helium, we should create it. b. “until human disease is a thing of the past, we cannot support laws that put helium supplies at risk.” this restates the claim of this argument, which is that we should do everything in our power to treat human diseases. c. “if there is any practical use for helium other than medicine, laws should change to protect current supplies of the gas.” this sentence summarizes one of the major points of the argument, which is that helium reserves are in low supply. d. “human health depends on helium, and therefore it is necessary to change the laws that make it hard to acquire.” this restates the claim of the argument and also summarizes the supporting evidence that illnesses can be treated by helium.
Answers: 1
question
World Languages, 24.06.2019 16:30
Asl may be used regularly in which field?
Answers: 1
question
World Languages, 26.06.2019 05:00
The scernio an example of which step in the five step model of communication jack: it was nice to meet you
Answers: 1
question
World Languages, 27.06.2019 11:30
He ran. thinking back now, he wasn't sure why he ran. maybe he was in a hurry to bring the shoes to his father, or maybe he was trying to run away from his miserable and humiliating day at school. —holes, louis sachar which text detail shows a flashback is happening?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
But this, but you – small, pitiful and twiggy – you put me down with wine, you blinded me. come back...
Questions
question
Computers and Technology, 09.07.2019 06:30
question
Mathematics, 09.07.2019 06:30
Questions on the website: 13722361