How did establishing a confederacy benefit the woodland native americans

You are a member of the jury for a murder case. the prosecution has presented dna evidence linking the defendant to the crime scene. the defense claims that dna evidence using str analysis with 13 markers is not sufficient to reliably distinguish between people. what do you think? a. the defense is right. str analysis with 13 markers gives a 1 in 1 million chance of two people having the same pattern, leaving a reasonable doubt. b. str analysis is not sufficient. the defendant's entire genome should be sequenced. the prosecution will have to consult a genomic library to make sure their dna evidence is valid. c. the prosecution is right. str analysis with 13 markers gives a 1 in 10 billion or greater chance that two people will have the same pattern. this person was at the crime scene. d. dna evidence is not generally accepted by legal experts.

When pay is made public, people evaluate how equitable their pay is in light of the pay other people are receiving. the problem in this case is that dwight and guillermo have found out that others are getting paid more than they do for the same work. what are they likely to do under these circumstances

The most effective way to provide children with safety messages is to