Which term refers to an opinion written by a justice in the majority that outlines additional considerations he or she thinks are important?

Concurring opinions

Explanation:

Concurring opinions are those that agree with the majority decision, but outline additional elements. This could be because a particular judge reached the same outcome as the majority but did so due to different reasons. It could also be that the judge wants to bring attention to additional details not considered in the majority decision. Although concurring opinions are not binding precedent, they can be useful as a type of persuasive argument.

you should think about the answers you give and expect the same form your questions.