Social Studies, 27.07.2019 11:30 PONBallfordM89

Select the appropriate conclusion from stanley milgram's experiment on authority and the infliction of suffering.

Answers: 1

Show answers

Answers

The appropriate conclusion from Stanley Milgram's experiment is that "people are surprisingly likely to follow not only the directions of legitimate authority figures, but also groups of "ordinary individuals."

The Milgram Examination was a standout among the most celebrated investigations of submission in psychology and it was done by Stanley Milgram, who was a psychologist. He directed a test concentrating on the contention between dutifulness and obedience to those in authority and individual conscience. He inspected supports for demonstrations of genocide offered by those blamed at the World War II Nuremberg War Criminal trials.

Answer from: sabrosaichigurl

The Stanley Milgram’s appropriate conclusion is that a majority of people continue to obey authority figures even if they believe that the act to be harmful or wrong to another person.

Further explanation:

Stanley Milgram was a psychologist who is famous for his study of obedience in psychology. Milgram conducted an experiment in which he focused on the conflict between an individual’s personal conscience and obedience to authority.

THE MILGRAM SHOCK EXPERIMENT

Milgram was interested in understanding that how far can individual go to obey the instruction even if those instructions involve harming another person. Milgram was interested in studying how an ordinary person gets influenced to commit atrocities.

According to this experiment, ordinary individuals are likely to follow orders of authority figure. He says these individuals commit atrocities even to the extent of killing other people. Obedience to authority is ingrained in an individual from the way he is brought up.

An individual tends to obey orders from others if they recognize that their authority is legally and morally right. An individual learns response to legitimate authority from a variety of institutions like school and family.

Learn more:

1. Three emotional effects of risky behaviors on one's lifestyle choice.

2. Evaluate and discuss the negative impact of the four chosen youth risk behaviors on yourself and others

Answer details:

Grade: College

Subject: Social Studies

Topic: The Milgram Shock Experiment

Keywords: authority, obedience, conscience, institutions, legitimate, response, atrocities

Answer from: Quest

Who it was like back then

Answer from: Quest

thots think tootsies drink tequila

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:20

But on an april morning in 1959, i heard a mother of four, having coffee with four other mothers in a suburban development fifteen miles from new york, say in a tone of quiet desperation, “the problem.” and the others knew, without words, that she was not talking about a problem with her husband, or her children, or her home. suddenly they realized they all shared the same problem, the problem that has no name. which best describes the connotation of the word “desperation”? negative, because the woman is feeling confused negative, because the woman is expressing hopelessness positive, because the woman is expressing herself positive, because the woman and the mothers are in agreement

Answers: 3

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 16:50

When arriving at a navigation lock what is the order of priority

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 17:40

Put the following steps for calculating net worth in the correct order. step #1: step #2: step #3: step #4: step #5:

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 21:50

Cooperation among oligopolies runs counter to the public interest because it leads to underproduction and high prices. in an effort to bring resource allocation closer to the social optimum, public officials attempt to force oligopolies to compete instead of cooperating. consider the following scenario: suppose that the presidents of two auto manufacturing companies exchange text messages in which they discuss jointly raising prices on their new lines of hybrid suvs. this illegal communication would violate which of the following laws? the sherman antitrust act of 1890 the robinson–patman act of 1936 the celler–kefauver act of 1950 the clayton act of 1914

Answers: 2

Answer

You know the right answer?

Select the appropriate conclusion from stanley milgram's experiment on authority and the infliction...

Questions