How might human population growth result in a tragedy of the commons

Tragedy of the commons, is a dilemma described by Garrett Hardin in 1968, and published in the journal Science, describes a situation in which several individuals, motivated only by personal interest and acting independently but rationally, end up destroying a shared resource. limited (the common) although to none of them, either as individuals or as a whole, it suits them that such destruction happens.

Hardin uses the example to analyze the relationship between freedom and responsibility. Although his work has been harshly criticized by other authors, the publication of it began a broad debate on the analysis of human behavior in the areas of economics, psychology, game theory, politics, sociology, etc.

It is considered that the dilemma represents an example of a social trap in which a social conflict is emphasized over the use of common resources, implying a contradiction between the interests or benefits of individuals and common or public goods.

We can therefore infer that population growth would be a problem for the commons, since for example resources such as water and land are limited.

the united states has a federal government. the president is the head of the federal government of the united states. however, each state forms its government for administration purposes. the powers of the state governments are exercised within restricted state boundaries. and citizens participate in this government by voting.

the old way of life was represented by superstition, an angry god, and absolute submission to authority. the thinkers of the age of reason ushered in a new way of thinking. this new way championed the accomplishments of humankind. individuals did not have to accept despair. science and reason could bring happiness and progress. kings did not rule by divine right. they had an obligation to their subjects. europeans pondered the implications for nearly a century. americans put them into practice first.