Why were the streets of cretans wide

Bull files a suit against clay in a state court over payment due on a short-term lease of grazing land. the case proceeds to trial, after which the court renders a verdict. the case is appealed to an appellate court. after its review of bull v. clay, the appellate court upholds the lower court’s verdict. the appellate court has:

A. in weeks v. united states (1914), the court established the exclusionary rule, which was incorporated to the states in mapp v. ohio (1961), and the court established the concept of a "good faith exception" to the exclusionary rule in united states v. leon (1984). in their opinion, the supreme court pointed out that compliance with the exclusionary rule can have a cost to society (criminals can go free) that outweighs the benefits (stopping illegal searches by police). ultimately, the court determined that despite the exclusionary rule, evidence can still be admitted in situations where police made genuine "good faith" efforts to act legally, but technically acted illegally, in obtaining the evidence. explain the exclusionary rule good faith exception and explain and support whether you agree or disagree with the concept of a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule? why or why not? use the lesson notes and/or one news source to support your answer.

What refers to the existence of more than one level of government in the country