Law experts believe that the best way for judges to use judicial restraint is to a) work to overturn and change court precedent. b) tackle controversial issues in the courtroom. c) create large rulings that deal with major ideas. d) make small rulings that pertain to specific cases

D) make small rulings that pertain to specific cases

Explanation:

The judicial restraint is basically the power of the judges to delcare a ruling or a bill unconstitutional, this is basically the power of judges to stop a rulin or a law, but law experts believe that the best way to enforce this power is to do it with small rulings that are done to specific cases.

explanation:

actually, not all representation was acceptable based on this little piece of article, in 1776, the second continental congress issued the declaration of independence, stating their specific grievances with the british monarchy and why they were going to create a separate government. after the colonies separated from the british monarchy and formed the united states of america, they had to answer some crucial questions: 1) if not a monarchy, what type of government was the united states going to have? 2) what kind of government was going to protect the people without violating their individual liberties?

what are the statements