Consider this argument: "if we drive on the pacific coast highway near san francisco we can see islands off the pacific coast. look! we can see islands off the pacific coast. so we are driving on the pacific coast highway near san francisco." that argument is an example of

For each of the following, mark whether it is a possible confounder (a factor that mixes up the results, making it look like candy is to blame when it's a causal (or causation) link which supports the argument that candy causes criminal behavior (ie, explains how candy leads to criminality ), or neither (an irrelevant factor, something that may cause people to become criminals but has nothing to do with eating candy). choose your answers based only< on the information given. additives in candy- additives found in candy may adversely affect brain development of young children in ways that could contribute towards adult aggression. impulsive personality-- kids who are highly impulsive and have trouble delaying gratification are more likely to eat candy every day as children and more likely to disobey laws as adults. violent abuse-- children who suffer violent abuse are more likely to become violent adults and commit violent crimes. gender- boys are overwhelmingly more likely to commit violent crimes

Which statement best describes a literary analysis? a literary analysis combines the writer's own opinions about a text with evidence from the text. a literary analysis contains only facts from a text and should not contain opinions. a literary analysis requires research from many sources of information to support an argument a literary analysis summarizes a text and makes a recommendation for others to read it.

What would you call a political system that is only meant to last for a short time