What was the purpose of checks and balances in the us government? why were these checks and balances needed? give specific examples. what was the purpose of the bill of rights? do you think the bill of rights succeeded in protecting the rights of everyone? explain why or why not.

The separation of powers and system of checks and balances limit the power of the government. However, at the time of writing the Constitution, not everyone agreed that these limits were enough. For the Constitution to take effect, at least nine states had to ratify or approve, it. Each state held its own convention to vote on ratifying the Constitution.

Federalists were a group of people who supported the ratification of the Constitution and a strong national government. Anti-Federalists were a group of people who opposed the ratification of the Constitution. They argued over the structure of the Constitution during the Constitutional Convention and in the months that followed.

This map shows the support for the Constitution by areas within each state. Note that the borders of the states were not all the same as today. The label for each state also tells you the date that the state ratified the Constitution.

Look at New York. How is it possible for a state that appears mostly against the Constitution to ratify it? Focus on the section of New York that is blue. The population living in that area was much higher, so more votes came from there.

the first option is correct

mark me brainliest

~courtney

the anti federalists was a movement that was opposed to the creation of a us federal government. although they were not as organized as the federalists, they also had a large group of leaders, especially in state politics.

the statement "now, in a large extended country, it is impossible to have a representation, possessing the sentiments, and of integrity, to declare the minds of the people” represents the concerns of the anti federalists.

they strongly believed that the federalists were representing the interests of aristocratic elements of society at the expense of the majority of ordinary people, who lived in a rural society.

their fear for the creation of a strong federal government and the president’s power of veto in their opinion would create a tyrannical rule that would dominate the people. they defended the importance of restraining the government’s power towards people at any cost.