The death penalty should be abolished because it is too expensive which reason best supports the central claim

The third alternative is correct (C).

Although we are living the 21st century, some countries still adopt the death penalty as punishment for serious crimes. This happens mainly in Eastern religious dictatorships, but incredibly it is still practiced in some US states.

We know that public policy is a matter of choice between different needs. In this sense, one of the functions of the state is to manage the best possible public resources to ensure the fulfillment of all constitutional demands.

In this way, it is perplexing that the state spends three times more to execute the death penalty than to arrest a criminal forever, as item (C) points out. Besides being a savagery, it is a waste of public resources.

send them to therapy or somthing like that

answer:

d. because dr. laguardia selected a widely used measure, his study generalizes to has strong external validity. external validity has limited external validity. other applications of this measure.

the widely used measure that he applied to his experiment was the benton facial recognition test. it employed on to football players and as result, only players who suffered brain concussions did not pas this test. and although it has an external validity, it is limited because it isn't general to apply to other population.