Read the quotation from al omari, an egyptian historian. this man [mansa musa] spread upon cairo the flood of his generosity: there was no person, officer of the court, or holder of any office of the sultanate who did not receive a sum of gold from him. the people of cairo earned incalculable sums from him, whether by buying and selling or by gifts. so much gold was current in cairo that it ruined the value of the money . . –al omari, egyptian historian, 1336 what does the passage state about emperor musa? he was stingy with his wealth and kept it to himself. he was generous with his money and raised the value of cairo’s currency. he spent so much money that he actually lowered the value of cairo’s currency. he was a wise man who spread learning wherever he went.

i honestly have no idea

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.