Please help :) thank you

For each of the following, mark whether it is a possible confounder (a factor that mixes up the results, making it look like candy is to blame when it's a causal (or causation) link which supports the argument that candy causes criminal behavior (ie, explains how candy leads to criminality ), or neither (an irrelevant factor, something that may cause people to become criminals but has nothing to do with eating candy). choose your answers based only< on the information given. additives in candy- additives found in candy may adversely affect brain development of young children in ways that could contribute towards adult aggression. impulsive personality-- kids who are highly impulsive and have trouble delaying gratification are more likely to eat candy every day as children and more likely to disobey laws as adults. violent abuse-- children who suffer violent abuse are more likely to become violent adults and commit violent crimes. gender- boys are overwhelmingly more likely to commit violent crimes

U.s. foreign aid incudes all the following programs excepta. humanitarian aidb. military assistancec. cycle of dependency grantsd. development aid

Flowchart with 6 boxes. box a sits at the very bottom of the left side of the flowchart, which flows into box b. box b flows into box c. box c flows into box d. on the bottom of the right side of the flowchart, box f flows into box e, and box e flows into box d. box d is the highest point in the flowchart. which of the following sections represent state-level courts? d, e, f b, e a, b, c a, f