subject
Social Studies, 16.12.2021 05:20 jimissac68

1. Corporate sponsorship of the Olympics leads to big profits. However, many people are advocating that corporations not support the Olympics in
China because of their poor record of human rights. Do you think
corporations should pull out from sponsoring the Olympics? Remember, it
could mean millions of dollars in profits for the companies.
2. What do you think would happen if corporations pull out from sponsoring
the Olympics?
3. From the headline sheet you can see examples of corporations that
support social justice-at least on their website. If the corporations like
Coke, Nike and AirBnB continue to be sponsors of the Olympics, will they
be true to their social justice stance?

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 21:00
What were some of the ways you learned about the political establishment through family members and friends? how were you politically socialized as a child?
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 06:40
Tanya was used to using word, and she did some work for her brother mike, who was using wordperfect. tanya was quickly able to use wordperfect for windows with little difficulty, since many of the commands for it were the same as the commands for word. tanya's ability to use wordperfect best illustrates:
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 08:30
Consider the speakers in "the raven" and the speaker in "the song of wandering aengus." write two paragraphs to compare and contrast the voice in these two poems. how does the poet give the speaker in each poem a distinctive voice? what effect does this voice have in each poem? use examples from each poem to as evidence for your answer "the raven"once upon a midnight dreary, while i pondered, weak and weary,over many a quaint and curious volume of forgotten lore—while i nodded, nearly napping, suddenly there came a tapping,as of some one gently rapping, rapping at my chamber door.“‘tis some visitor,” i muttered, “tapping at my chamber door—only this and nothing more.”ah, distinctly i remember it was in the bleak december, and each separate dying ember wrought its ghost upon the floor. eagerly i wished the morrow; —vainly i had sought to borrowfrom my books surcease of sorrow—sorrow for the lost lenore—for the rare and radiant maiden whom the angels name lenore—nameless here for evermore.and the silken sad uncertain rustling of each purple curtainthrilled me—filled me with fantastic terrors never felt before; so that now, to still the beating of my heart, i stood repeating“‘tis some visitor entreating entrance at my chamber door—some late visitor entreating entrance at my chamber door; this it is and nothing more.”"the song of wandering aengus." i went out to the hazel wood,because a fire was in my head,and cut and peeled a hazel wand,and hooked a berry to a thread; and when white moths were on the wing,and moth-like stars were flickering out,i dropped the berry in a streamand caught a little silver trout.when i had laid it on the floori went to blow the fire aflame,but something rustled on the floor, and some one called me by my name: it had become a glimmering girlwith apple blossom in her hairwho called me by my name and ranand faded through the brightening air.plz hurry
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00
Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred.at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act.b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act.c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan.d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
1. Corporate sponsorship of the Olympics leads to big profits. However, many people are advocatin...
Questions
question
Arts, 02.03.2021 23:50
question
History, 02.03.2021 23:50
question
Mathematics, 02.03.2021 23:50
question
Mathematics, 02.03.2021 23:50
question
Mathematics, 02.03.2021 23:50
Questions on the website: 13722360