Categorize each item in their respective categories -categories: structural functionalism, conflict theory, symbolic interactionism.

Items:

labeling theory

Crime can be good as if it defines the boundaries of behavior

Strain theory

“Upward mobility in America is nonexistent as the system of riffed for the haves and oppressive to have-nots”

Mark and Weber

I’m really stuck on this one help would be most appreciated

Charles schenck was a u.s. citizen and private in the army. while in military training during world war i, schenck printed and passed out leaflets explaining why he was against the draft (required military service). he was charged with violating the espionage act of 1917, a federal law outlawing any action interfering with military operations. schenck believed the espionage act violated his right to free speech. in which court would this case ultimately be decided, and why? a state criminal court, because schenck was accused of violating a criminal law a military tribunal, because the matter involved members of the military a county civil court, because it involved violation of a civil liberty the u.s. supreme court, because schenck challenged whether the law was constitutional

"martin luther king, jr. was buried the day after my first child was born, my daughter brooke. she was born april the eighth of 1968. i went from the hospital to the grave. and i spent three days thinking about what i was going to do with my life and decided that politics, although not perfect, was the best available nonviolent means of changing how we live. " - maynard jackson, 1990 which statement best explains how maynard jackson's 1968 decision foretold his future? question 8 options: he was elected mayor of atlanta in 1973 he was elected governor of georgia in 1990. he started his own bond and security business he removed segregation signs form water fountains at city hall

Sara and her friends were at an iowa football game in iowa city. sara is a life long resident of iowa and goes to college at dmacc. while she was in iowa city, robert smashed into her car when he ran a red light. sara was seriously injured and taken to university hospitals in iowa city (fortunately her injuries were not life threatening but laid her up for a long time and she had to drop out of college for the rest of the semester). robert is from michigan and was in iowa city to see the game and then to party later. at the time of the accident robert was drunk (at least legally - he blew a 0.17 and the limit is 0.08). sara has sustained about $500,000 in damages between her current and future medical bills, pain/suffering, lost wages, etc. also her car was totaled in the accident. can sara sue robert in a federal court? explain why or why not. (be sure to mention the two primary factors associated with suing someone in a federal court in a case like this.)