The Kyle Rittenhouse case represents not only an example of a violent counter protester (Rittenhouse) but a peaceful protest which had turned violent and led to the distruction of many small businesses in Kenosha, Wisconsin. How do you think the government should have handled this case better to prevent what happened from happening? Is there any way for the government to know when a protest will turn violent? How should they try to stop violence while not limiting our right to assemble?

i would say b probably

yes

it is because 3 because the citizen the northern democratic party watned the warning on red to blue because it is purple. lol

world war i had a devastating effect on german-americans and their cultural heritage. up until that point   german-americans, as a group, had been spared much of the discrimination, abuse, rejection, collective mistrust experienced by so many different racial and ethnic groups in the history of the united states. indeed, over the years, they had been viewed as a well integrated and esteemed part of american society. all of this change with the outbreak of war.  

the answer to your question is,

old stone age.

-mabel < 3