subject
Social Studies, 08.12.2021 23:00 frankcaroccio0203

What is the punishment for involuntary manslaughter

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 19:30
Why would it be hard to live in a city state
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 02:30
What idea did most of the founding fathers,despite their differences, agree with?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 03:40
"it is one thing to say that the police cannot be used as an instrument for the suppression of unpopular views, and another to say that, when as here the speaker passes the bounds of argument and undertakes incitement to riot, they are powerless to prevent a breach of peace." --chief justice fred m. vinson, 1951 chief justice fred m. vinson's writings in feiner v. new york conclude that freedom of speech must be protected at all costs, including a breach of the peace. select the best answer from the choices provided ot of next submit mark this and return
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
What is the punishment for involuntary manslaughter...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 26.09.2019 12:10
question
History, 26.09.2019 12:10
question
Mathematics, 26.09.2019 12:10
question
Mathematics, 26.09.2019 12:10
question
Mathematics, 26.09.2019 12:10
Questions on the website: 13722360