How do the details in this timeline support the authors’ purpose? The details about the shift of power in France help persuade readers that France was important to the sugar industry.
The details about the changing laws in France help inform readers that Napoleon wanted to produce sugar cheaply by using enslaved people.
The details about the French Revolution help inform readers about the process of executing enemies.
The details about Marie Antoinette help persuade readers that the French royalty were not well liked.

Bull files a suit against clay in a state court over payment due on a short-term lease of grazing land. the case proceeds to trial, after which the court renders a verdict. the case is appealed to an appellate court. after its review of bull v. clay, the appellate court upholds the lower court’s verdict. the appellate court has:

Cooperation among oligopolies runs counter to the public interest because it leads to underproduction and high prices. in an effort to bring resource allocation closer to the social optimum, public officials attempt to force oligopolies to compete instead of cooperating. consider the following scenario: suppose that the presidents of two auto manufacturing companies exchange text messages in which they discuss jointly raising prices on their new lines of hybrid suvs. this illegal communication would violate which of the following laws? the sherman antitrust act of 1890 the robinson–patman act of 1936 the celler–kefauver act of 1950 the clayton act of 1914

Which statement about jews is not correct? question 6 options: a: jews had been disliked and persecuted for many centuries. b: jews lived and worked in businesses throughout germany. c: many germans blamed jews for germany’s economic problems. d: jews began migrating to germany after the end of world war i.