Từ việc nghiên cứu nội dung quy luật từ những sự thay đổi về lượng dẫn đễn sự thay đổi về chất, bạn hãy chứng minh rằng thắng lợi của cách mạng Tháng 8/1945 là quá trình chuẩn bị lâu dài của cách mạng Việt Nam, chứ không phải là một cuộc cách mạng ăn may

Ocean currents that move away from the equator carry warm, moist air and ocean currents that move away from the poles carry cooler, dryer air. based upon this information in the map above, which of the following statements is true? a. the climate on the western coast of south africa is warm and rainy.b. the climate on the eastern coast of south africa is warm and rainy.c. the climate on the eastern coast of australia is cool and dry.d. the climate on the eastern coast of japan is warm and rainy.

Which features are created on the exterior of a volcano when it erupts? check all that apply. vent crater hot spot lava flow boundary

Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.