WHY DOES NO ONE EVER THANK ME FOR THE MAGNA CARTA? 1.
PART A: Which of the following best identifies the central theme of this story?

A
Kings must protect their people and expand their territory through wars.
B
People deserve the right to representation in the government that they pay taxes to.
C
There should be the same universal human rights for all.
D
King John is misunderstood, for without him we would not have the first constitution with human rights.
2.
PART B: Which phrase from the text best support the answers to Part A?

A
"...some believe that all people should just have these rights, no matter what is written down by their leaders." ( Paragraph 3)
B
"It is a king's job to keep his land rich, large, and safe so that he holds more power and can take better care of his people." ( Paragraph 4)
C
"Now they would represent the people and help me make decisions, but I didn't like this at all. It took away my power!" ( Paragraph 5)
D
"But now that I see it makes people very happy, I just want you to know that it was I, King John." ( Paragraph 5)
3.
According to the author, what was the main reason that the people wrote the Magna Carta?

A
The people were mad that they had to pay unfair taxes for wars they did not ask for.
B
The barons wanted more power for themselves as representatives of the people.
C
The people were sick of being jailed for life by one another without a reason.
D
The people wanted to overthrow King John and create a representative government.
3.
According to the author, what was the main reason that the people wrote the Magna Carta?

A
The people were mad that they had to pay unfair taxes for wars they did not ask for.
B
The barons wanted more power for themselves as representatives of the people.
C
The people were sick of being jailed for life by one another without a reason.
D
The people wanted to overthrow King John and create a representative government.

development:   floodplain development often directly impacts wetlands by removing vegetation (increasing bank erosion),   and filling or draining wetlands for building sites.   floodplain development sometimes indirectly impacts riparian wetlands through the installation of artificial stream stabilizing devices like rip-rap and bulk-heads that attempt to stop the natural meandering process which creates new wetlands and replenishes existing ones.    

road building:   most river valleys have roads and/or railroads.   these structures squeeze rivers and streams by narrowing the floodplain.   this destabilizes the river which   has less room to meander and therefore has an excess of energy.   the roads and railroads also affect drainage from uplands onto the floodplains, and many are built on top of areas that once were wetlands.   such roads often create long, low-quality wetlands upslope of the road by interrupting surface and groundwater flows.   these wetlands can attract wildlife dangerously close to roads.   wetland loss caused by roads is mitigated through the restoration of other impacted wetlands although the replacement wetlands are not always of the same type and quality as those lost. see montana department of transportation's off-site wetland mitigation reserves map.

grazing: overgrazing harms wetlands through soil compaction, removal of vegetation, and stream bank destabilization.   wetlands offer some of the best forage for livestock as well as a water source and cover, so livestock tends to spend a disproportionately large time in wetlands.   there are many grazing strategies that discourage cattle from using wetlands. click on rwrp's web site for a discussion of these strategies.

agriculture:   wetlands often have fairly flat areas of rich organic soil that is highly productive agricultural land if drained.   for this reason many wetlands have been drained and converted to agricultural lands.  

mining: historic mining has had a major impact on wetlands of the clark fork basin, particularly along the upper river where mine wastes have been deposited in the floodplain, creating the country’s largest superfund site. view the superfund site.  

the epa also list the following as major human causes of wetland loss:   logging,   runoff, air and water pollution, introducing nonnative species. see examples of nonnative species here.

the following lists specific damaging actions commonly taken in wetlands.

dumping:   dumping fill material buries hydric soils and effectively lowers the water table so hydrophytic (water loving) plants cannot compete with upland plants.  

            dredging:   the removal of material from a wetland or river bed.   dredging of streams lowers the surrounding water table and dries up adjacent wetlands.

            draining:   water is drained from wetlands by cutting ditches into the ground which collect and transport water out of the wetland.   this lowers the water table and dries out the wetland.    

            diverting flow:   water is diverted around wetlands, lowering the water table.  

            devegetation:   vegetation plays an important role in wetland ecology by removing water through evapotranspiration, altering water and soil chemistry, providing habitat for wildlife, and reducing erosion.   removal of vegetation can drastically and sometimes irreversibly alter wetland function.

            damming flow:   many ponds and reservoirs are constructed on wetlands.   a flooded wetland cannot provide the same habitats and functions.  

            development of springs:   pumping large quantities of water from springs lowers nearby groundwater and can result in the loss of wetland vegetation.   compaction of springs by cattle can cause springs to cease to flow.

explanation:

trade regulation is a field of law, often bracketed with antitrust (as in the phrase “antitrust and trade regulation law”), including government regulation of unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive business acts or practices. antitrust law is often considered a subset of trade regulation law. franchise and distribution law, consumer protection law, and advertising law are sometimes considered parts of trade regulation law.

in general the theory of economics says that the more open to trade a country is the better   the result for the same country and the whole economies.

in real life countries impose taxes, quotas, etc which is not so good for the economies.

this kind of commercial war between the usa and china is slowing down the growth of the whole world so we can say that it is a draw back of trade regulations. and the free trade agreements are benefits of trade regulations.

think its caste system

explanation:

answer; limbic system;