subject
Social Studies, 18.10.2021 19:50 darlene93

PL HELP ME OUT PL GIVING OUT 63 POINTS OUT WHO EVERY ANSWERS THIS CORRECTLY PLESSY V. FERGUSON: A SUMMARY

(question 3) Plessy’s lawyers argued that Louisiana’s segregation law violated both the Thirteenth Amendment, which bars slavery, and the Fourteenth Amendment, which guarantees all Americans equal protection under the law.

3. Why did Plessy believe that the Separate Car Act violated his rights under the Fourteenth Amendment?

(question 4) Louisiana courts consistently found against Plessy, and the case moved all the way to the Supreme Court. The U. S. Supreme Court ruled 7-1 in Plessy v. Ferguson that a Louisiana law requiring “equal but separate accommodations for the white and colored races” was constitutional.

Writing for the Court’s majority, Justice Henry Brown ruled that the law did not “discriminate” among legal rights by race, but merely recognized a “distinction” between races “which must always exist so long as white men are distinguished from the other race by color.” …The ruling established the “separate but equal” doctrine that informs many states’ decision to segregate public facilities— schools, railcars, even drinking fountains.

4. How did the precedent set by the case affect the lives of African Americans beyond the issue of travel in railroads?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 21:30
A. in weeks v. united states (1914), the court established the exclusionary rule, which was incorporated to the states in mapp v. ohio (1961), and the court established the concept of a "good faith exception" to the exclusionary rule in united states v. leon (1984). in their opinion, the supreme court pointed out that compliance with the exclusionary rule can have a cost to society (criminals can go free) that outweighs the benefits (stopping illegal searches by police). ultimately, the court determined that despite the exclusionary rule, evidence can still be admitted in situations where police made genuine "good faith" efforts to act legally, but technically acted illegally, in obtaining the evidence. explain the exclusionary rule good faith exception and explain and support whether you agree or disagree with the concept of a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule? why or why not? use the lesson notes and/or one news source to support your answer.
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 07:30
What was different about warfare in the early 1800s and early 1900s?
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 12:00
What are the qualifications to be a member of the house of representatives
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 15:10
Sailors went to special school to learn how to use the new technology that would them sail far distences. the school we know about was
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
PL HELP ME OUT PL GIVING OUT 63 POINTS OUT WHO EVERY ANSWERS THIS CORRECTLY PLESSY V. FERGUSON: A...
Questions
question
History, 14.09.2020 22:01
question
Mathematics, 14.09.2020 22:01
question
Mathematics, 14.09.2020 22:01
question
English, 14.09.2020 22:01
question
Social Studies, 14.09.2020 22:01
question
History, 14.09.2020 22:01
question
English, 14.09.2020 22:01
question
Social Studies, 14.09.2020 22:01
question
French, 14.09.2020 22:01
question
Mathematics, 14.09.2020 22:01
question
Mathematics, 14.09.2020 22:01
question
French, 14.09.2020 22:01
question
History, 14.09.2020 22:01
question
Biology, 14.09.2020 22:01
question
Mathematics, 14.09.2020 22:01
question
Mathematics, 14.09.2020 22:01
question
History, 14.09.2020 22:01
question
Mathematics, 14.09.2020 22:01
question
History, 14.09.2020 22:01
Questions on the website: 13722363