subject
Social Studies, 23.09.2021 14:00 rissaroo159

6 / 10 01 Multple choice
How were the Archal people who lived at the Eva Site similar to the early humans who lived at icehouse Bottom?
They bundd their dead in mounds
They traded with faraway peoples
They but the same sort of netters
They had the same government structure

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 22:50
An experimenter is examining the relationship between age and self-disclosure. a large sample of participants that are 25 to 35 years old and participants that are 65 to 75 years old are compared, and significant differences are found with younger participants disclosing much more than older people. the researcher reports an effect size of .34. what does this mean
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 00:00
On their way home, what do claudia and jamie decide to do? a. visit the museum every week with mrs. frankweiler and make more discoveries about the exhibits b. tell saxonberg about the mystery behind the angel statue and give the sketch to the museum c. introduce mrs. frankweiler to their parents and tell her that they have adopted her as their grandmother d. visit mrs. frankweiler as often as they can and adopt her as their grandmother
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 18:00
17 points! ! (explain your answer)
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
6 / 10 01 Multple choice
How were the Archal people who lived at the Eva Site similar to the...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 20.05.2021 01:50
question
Mathematics, 20.05.2021 01:50
question
Mathematics, 20.05.2021 01:50
question
Mathematics, 20.05.2021 01:50
question
Computers and Technology, 20.05.2021 01:50
Questions on the website: 13722360