In, "The Morality of Euthanasia," Rachels rejects a strictly Utilitarian argument that would allow euthanasia in some cases, but he endorses a similar argument, one he says is "inspired by Utilitarianism." What is the difference between the two? In the revised argument, the violation of rights is permitted, while in the Utilitarian argument the violation of rights is always forbidden The revised argument is egoistic in nature The revised argument does not use the principle of utility as a premise whereas the Utilitarian argument does All of the above There is no difference between the two

How is the city of savannah related to the union strategy of a full blockade of confederate ports? a) savannah was the last port needed to be secured in order to totally blockade the coast of georgia. b) savannah was the least significant city in georgia, and the union strategy centered on securing atlanta and capturing the tennessee river. c) savannah was the least significant city in georgia, and the union strategy centered on securing atlanta and capturing the chattahoochee river. d) savannah was the most significant port in georgia, and the union strategy centered on securing bases at savannah and the outlying islands to fully blockade georgia.