The two basic types of personality assessments include projective tests and self-report inventories. Clinicians have long argued regarding which type of test is more appropriate for assessing personality. Some believe due to the highly subjective nature of projective tests, they tend to lack both validity and reliability. Others believe projective tests can obtain qualitative information such as motivations, beliefs, attitudes and values that are not easily obtained by utilizing self-reports. Utilizing two well known types of projective tests, discuss why they are considered subjective and how this can affect validity and reliability. What are the pros and cons of projective tests and self-reports and discuss your views on which is a more effective method of assessing personality. See attached article (in Resources) for additional information. Provide present research that supports your view from at least two peer reviewed articles and cite your sources using APA format.

Aplaintiff filed a civil action based on negligence against a defendant in federal district court, alleging that the defendant negligently ran a red light at an intersection and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle, causing the plaintiff's injuries. a week after the close of discovery, the plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether the defendant was negligent. with the motion, the plaintiff filed (i) his own sworn affidavit, which stated that the traffic signal was green as he entered the intersection, (ii) an affidavit of a witness who was driving the car behind him, which stated that the witness saw the entire incident and that the plaintiff's traffic signal was green as he approached and entered the intersection; and (iii) an affidavit of another witness, which stated that she saw the entire incident and that the defendant's signal had been red for several seconds before the defendant entered the intersection and was still red when the defendant entered the intersection. the defendant filed a response to the motion, noting that her answer denied negligence and further denied that her traffic signal was red, and argued that the issue of negligence and the issue of whether her traffic signal was red were in dispute, so those issues should be tried to a jury. how should the court rule on the plaintiff's motion?

Hypothetically speaking, you are assigned to a committee of three to decide on a dress code for campbellsville university staff and faculty. only two of the three votes are required to pass this policy. in this situation you are one of the two agreeing to a dress code. what steps might you take to gain the cooperation of the third party after the policy has been initiated.

Read the scenario. samira is a freshman basketball player who hopes to go to college on a basketball scholarship. she is offered the chance to play on her school’s varsity basketball team, which plays in tournaments during holiday breaks. samira usually spends her breaks working at the local hardware store. after careful consideration, samira decides to stay on the freshman basketball team and keep working over breaks.the fact that samira may miss out on a scholarship opportunity by staying on the freshman team illustrates-a cause.-minor consequences.-a trade off.-unexpected risk.