Figgins is the dean of a college. He appointed Sue to be acting dean while he was out of the country and posted an announcement on the college website which said that Sue was authorized to act in his place. Figgins also told Sue privately that she could do most everything in his job description while he was away, but she did not have the right to make admissions decisions. While Figgins was gone, Sue overruled the admissions committee to admit the child of a wealthy alumnus. Does the child have the right to attend this college

Yes

Explanation:

Yes, in this scenario the child has the right to attend this college. This is because despite Fliggins telling Sue privately that she could not make admission decisions, he still publicly appointed her acting dean and publicly gave her all authority as a dean. Therefore, due to this Sue had apparent authority over all matters that are normally handled by the dean of the college. This includes admissions to the college.

as university of miami psychologists debra lieberman and adam smith pointed out in a recent article in the journal current directions in psychological science, humans have social and psychological mechanisms to deter incest. with very few exceptions, marriages between brothers and sisters and between parents and their children are verboten in every human culture. the primary psychological anti-incest mechanism is the yuck response. even the idea of sex with their mom or dad, bro or sis is upsetting to most people. the psychologist jonathan haidt has found that nearly everyone is repelled by the prospect of brother-sister sex, even in hypothetical situations in which there is no chance of pregnancy).

the biological cost of incest

this raises an interesting question: just what’s so bad about incest? sure, having sex with your dad or your sister seems gross — but why? some anthropologists have argued that incest taboos are learned social conventions. this explanation, however, doesn’t make sense to me as it does not explain the widespread existence of anti-incest mechanisms in creatures ranging from cockroaches to chimpanzees. second, the incest taboo is about as close to a universal law as human moral rules get.

why should mechanisms to avoid incest be so widespread both in nature and across human societies? the answer is simple. the problem with having sex close with relatives is that there is an astonishingly high chance that your offspring will be born with a serious birth defect.

the answer is in the us third parties have yet to win the presidency hope this ! can you mark brainliest?