A state adopted a statute making the ritual slaughter of chickens illegal. The legislative debates made clear that the purpose of the statute was to prevent unnecessary cruelty to animals. The religious leader of a church located within the state, whose core religious beliefs require ritual slaughter of chickens during worship services, brought suit to have the statute declared unconstitutional for violating her right to practice her religion. How will the court likely rule

Invalidate the statute, because it targets only ritual slaughter

Explanation:

Invalidate the statute, because it targets only ritual slaughter

The court will probably strike the statute because it targets ritual slaughter. Even though the First Amendment provides that the free exercise of religion shall not be truncated.. The Supreme Court has stated that the amendment does not allow the government from outlawing religious beliefs and it has struck down a statute similar to the one here that outlaws conduct merely because it is religious (i.e., ritual slaughter of chickens is prohibited).

this is a pretty broad question and can be a pretty lengthy answer. since 1900, women have gained a lot more rights and have become active in the workforce. with women being in the workforce, men play a larger role in family life. many family tasks are shared between men and women, whereas, women used to be the sole family caretakers.

that should get you started at least.

the values of the selma marchers was to bring   their ability to vote into law. mlk was not hat march, which was protesting toward lbj