Social Studies, 12.07.2021 08:40 KodxJosh

Mention any four challenge of sustainable development in nepal

Answers: 2

Show answers

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 02:20

John redmond was not paid for trim carpentry work that he did for brenda knighton in her home. ms. knighton does not dispute that redmond did the work, but she says that he waited too long to file the suit because the time for suit is measured from the time the work began, which was over 4 years ago, and not from the time she failed to pay, which was two years ago. the statute of limitations in their state is four years. which of the following is a correct statement? the csae must be dismissed because of the statute of limitations the case qualifies for a directed verdict the case can be decided on a summary judgment motion the case can be dismissed on a judgment of the pleadings

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 11:40

Question 18 multiple choice worth 3 points) (american money lo 4 hc) suppose the federal reserve raises interest rates. which of the following predicts the most likely results? the money supply will decrease, meaning that banks will give fewer loans and prices for goods and services will fall. the money supply will decrease, meaning that more people will buy goods and services and prices will rise, the money supply will increase, meaning that banks will give more loans and more businesses can open and hire workers. the money supply will increase, meaning that prices will rise and businesses will not hire many workers. i will mark the brainliest

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 12:50

The term civil liberties refers to specific individual rights that

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:50

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.

Answers: 2

Answer

You know the right answer?

Mention any four challenge of sustainable development in nepal...

Questions