A legal interpretation of the Constitution that suggests we must understand it in the context of contemporary realities is called

A legal interpretation of the Constitution that suggests we must understand it in the context of contemporary realities is called pragmatism or pragmatic interpretation of the Constitution.

Explanation:

A pragmatic interpretation of the Constitution claims that there should be an evolution in the way we interpret it. It can be counterproductive or even dangerous to keep on interpreting the Constitution according to its original meaning or intent. Time and context change, and so should the interpretation. It must be adapted to the current realities. The Constitution must be seen as dynamic and evolving.

the two sets of lines are :

answer; i believe that the correct answer is ( rivers);