In Griswold v. Connecticut, on what did Justice Goldberg base his concurring opinion? the protection granted by the Constitution
the intention of the writers of the Constitution
the list of rights in the first eight amendments
the human rights safe from government intervention

The protection granted by the Constitution .

Explanation:

The 1965 Supreme Court case of Griswold v. Connecticut was about the rights of an individual (in this case, a married couple) in using contraceptive pills. This case pertains to the individual liberty to do what they want without any government restriction.

This ruling contradicted a Connecticut law that prohibits or illegalizes the use of "any drug, medicinal article, or instrument for the purpose of preventing conception..." Justice Arthur Goldberg ruled that this law cannot be justified and is unconstitutional, pointing out that the state has no right to intrude into a person's personal/ intimate affairs. He based his ruling on the Constitutional rights of individuals to be protected from such events, in this case, the protection of one’s privacy in marital affairs.

Thus, the correct answer is the first option.

well, paralell is parallel. i am providing links to .

hope this !

a series circuit is one with all the loads in a row. there is only one path for the electricity to flow. if this circuit was a string of light bulbs, and one blew out, the remaining bulbs would turn off.

unlike in series circuits, a charge in a parallel circuit encounters a single voltage drop during its path through the external circuit. the current through a given branch can be predicted using the ohm's law equation and the voltage drop across the resistor and the resistance of the resistor.

a parallel circuit has certain characteristics and basic rules: a parallel circuit has two or more paths for current to flow through. voltage is the same across each component of the parallel circuit.