Use the article "World War II and Its Unbreakable Code" and your knowledge of social studies to answer this question. Why might the Japanese military have been unable to break the Navajo Code Talkers' Code?

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached we can say the following.

Unfortunately, you did not attach the article, so we are only using our knowledge of social studies to answer this question.

Why might the Japanese military have been unable to break the Navajo Code Talkers Code?

The Japanese military was not familiar with the language spoken by the Navajo Native American Indian tribe and there was no way they could learn the language as adults because it was so difficult and had no time to learn it in the middle of the war.

The code talkers developed the original version of the Navajo code in that they were looking for a special code to use in the war that was extremely difficult to be intercepted and translated by the enemy. That is why the code talkers developed a special code with elements of the Navajo language. During World War 1, Choctaw transmitted codified messages to the US Army headquarters in countries like France. Years later, by the 1940s during World War II, the US Army recruited Native American Indians such as Cherokees, Comanches, and Hopis. But in 1941, it was the Marine Corps the ones that hired Navajo Code Talkers to transmit secret communication during the war.

trade regulation is a field of law, often bracketed with antitrust (as in the phrase “antitrust and trade regulation law”), including government regulation of unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive business acts or practices. antitrust law is often considered a subset of trade regulation law. franchise and distribution law, consumer protection law, and advertising law are sometimes considered parts of trade regulation law.

in general the theory of economics says that the more open to trade a country is the better   the result for the same country and the whole economies.

in real life countries impose taxes, quotas, etc which is not so good for the economies.

this kind of commercial war between the usa and china is slowing down the growth of the whole world so we can say that it is a draw back of trade regulations. and the free trade agreements are benefits of trade regulations.

can you explain it better