subject
Social Studies, 25.05.2021 20:00 alemorachis49

20 POINTS How were the Mauryan and Gupta empires different?
A) Unlike the Mauryans, the Guptas collected taxes from districts and villages.
B) Unlike the Mauryans, the Guptas established a central government that allowed local rule.
C) Unlike the Guptas, the Mauryans encouraged construction of public works.
D) Unlike the Guptas, the Mauryans encouraged the caste system to form a stable government.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 12:00
“dear sir: it is with great reluctance, i trouble you on a subject, which does not fall within your province; but it is a subject that occasions me more distress, than i have felt, since the commencement of the war; and which loudly demands the most zealous exertions of every person of weight and authority, who is interested in the success of our affairs. i mean the present dreadful situation of the army for want of provisions, and the miserable prospects before us, with respect to futurity. it is more alarming than you will probably conceive, for, to form a just idea, it were necessary to be on the spot. for some days past, there has been little less, than a famine in camp. a part of the army has been a week, without any kind of flesh, and the rest for three or four days. naked and starving as they are, we cannot enough admire the incomparable patience and fidelity of the soldiery, that they have not been ere this excited by their sufferings, to a general mutiny or dispersion. strong symptoms, however, discontent have appeared in particular instances; and nothing but the most acitive efforts every where can long avert so shocking a catastrophe.” what’s the central idea?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:00
Awoman was found strangled in the basement of her home where she lived with her husband. the crime scene was processed and investigators left. the next day, the medical examiner reported that a scalloped, woven belt was used to strangle the victim. the police asked the husband to search the house again to look for such a belt and he agreed. a belt was found that matched marks on the victim. the man was arrested. his attorney made a motion that the belt be excluded from the evidence as he contended that the search was not legal. which statement is true? a. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as needed according to the fourth amendment to the u.s. constitution. b. the belt is admissible because the man gave his consent to the second search. c. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as need according to michigan v. tyler. d. the belt is admissible as evidence, according to mincey v. arizona.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 19:30
What does it mean when a government decides to do something?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 21:00
Karin bought illegal firearms at a gun show. at her trial, she alleged that she had committed this crime because her boyfriend had threatened to harm her and her two daughters if she did not. her lawyer asked the judge to instruct the jury that the prosecution had an obligation to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that karin had acted freely. instead, the judge told the jury that karin had the burden of proving duress by a preponderance of the evidence. who is correct?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
20 POINTS How were the Mauryan and Gupta empires different?
A) Unlike the Mauryans, the Gupta...
Questions
question
Physics, 22.04.2020 09:53
question
History, 22.04.2020 09:53
question
Mathematics, 22.04.2020 09:53
question
Mathematics, 22.04.2020 09:53
question
Mathematics, 22.04.2020 09:53
question
Mathematics, 22.04.2020 09:53
Questions on the website: 13722360