subject
Social Studies, 24.05.2021 23:50 ronniem

Why might it have been a bad idea for Diocletian to split the Roman Empire into two halves in A. D. 285? 1. The western empire eventually grew stronger than the east, making it susceptible to barbarian invasions.

2. In the short term, the division made the Empire more easily governable.

3. The western half spoke Latin, while the eastern half spoke Greek.

4. Over time, the east and western halves failed to adequately work together to combat outside threats, and the two often competed for resources.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 03:00
Explain the events that led to the iranian revolution and the following iranian hostage crisis. how was the united states involved with iran? describe the arab-israeli conflicts of the 20th century. be sure to include specific military interventions, peace agreements, and the ultimate reason for conflict.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 21:30
Research the practice of key logging in current literature. describe what it is and explain why some people defend the practice, while others do not. finally, give your own opinion and defend it. cite your sources.
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 24.06.2019 10:00
Trade with india and china allowed romans to buy rare goods such as? cinnamon and ivory fish and olive oil marble and wine meats and fruits
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 24.06.2019 10:30
Which region of india became more powerful after the fall of the gupta empire? a.north b.east c.south d.west
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Why might it have been a bad idea for Diocletian to split the Roman Empire into two halves in A. D....
Questions
question
Mathematics, 19.08.2019 10:30
question
Mathematics, 19.08.2019 10:30
question
Mathematics, 19.08.2019 10:30
Questions on the website: 13722363