How does the citizens' role in a democratic government differ from the citizens' role in an autocratic government?

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached we can say the following.

How does the citizens' role in a democratic government differ from the citizens' role in an autocratic government?

The role of the citizen's role in a democratic government differs from the citizens' role in an autocratic government in that the citizens that live in a democratic country have the right to freely express their opinions and have the right to participate in elections to vote and choose their President and representatives. They also have other rights such as freedom of the press, freedom of religion, and freedom of assembly, among others.

On the other hand, the citizens' role in an autocratic government is limited to obedience. Yes, an autocratic government does not grant any rights to its citizens. On the contrary, citizens of autocratic governments live in obedience. Their opinions are not welcome, and many times when they want to express themselves they are repressed. Mass media is also controlled by the autocratic ruler.

answer; ///i believe that the correct answer is (d) when each house of congress passes a different version of a bill and those difference must be

panem is a communist totalitarian dictatorship where all the resources and how they are allocated belongs to the capitol. the districts exist only to provide goods and services for the capital and most of the citizens live in poverty. it is a police state where the "peacekeepers" use force and threats to keep the people under control. dissent is outlawed and those who disobey the law are executed, flogged, or turned into avoxes. the games are another means in which the ruling elite in the capitol exert their power over the districts. when reading the books i drew parallels between panem and the soviet union and north korea. in no way is panem capitalist. the people in the capitol are wealthy but the majority of them are involved in the government somehow. it was the same way in the former soviet union where bigwigs in the communist party and high ranking government officials were given access to goods, services, medical treatments not available to the general public. if you think panem has a capitalist economy you need to brush up on your economics.