Analyze the extent to which rulers of Indian States could exercise power independently of the British in the period 1750 – 1800.

Before 1750, the European country begin to Industrialize in light of that those country started their inquiry  for the crude material, so those country began to colonize other country in look for the crude materials.  

Preceding the British appearance In India, the Mughal domain was rule however the majority of the South Asia followed  the religion of Hinduism and since the Mughal realm was ruled by a Muslim domain, People of south east  were not faithful to the leader of the Mughal domain. This is the point at which the British east Indian organization saw this  as a chance and make union with the local ruler to take in desire to oust Mughal Empire.  

This drove sepoy Mutiny which was Indian individuals In the British east Indian organization. Albeit the Indian  Sovereigns practiced their force in many, anyway a large portion of the Indian state's ruler practice their force  

they didn't haven't any force after they made a partnership and attempted to retaliate with them and British  had more prominent impact than the Indian rulers .  

Indian ruler didn't have more prominent impact than the British east Indian organization. In this  answer Its Suggest by the Emperor of the Southeast Indian that ruler of the Tanjore are not faithful and  they ought not make a union with the British East Indian organization since they resemble the France.  

This shows the steadfastness of the Indian Emperor to the British East Indian organization further demonstrating the  Indian demonstrating that the sovereign had little force than the British. Furthermore,It demonstrates the East India  Organization had more prominent force than the Indian ruler on the grounds that the authority of the organization John Malcolm  is advancing that the organization will attempt to secure the local Indian Principalities.