Question 1 (1 point) The Moral Absolutist can attempt to reject the claim that cultures have disagreed about fundamental moral claims by using the case of cow-eating being wrong in some cultures but not wrong in others. The Moral Absolutist can use this case to show that: Question 1 options: Apparent moral disagreements might actually be non-moral disagreements. Morality is ultimately about minimizing pain. Cows are ultimately different than humans with regard to self-awareness. It is possible that cows have human ancestors in them Cultures are usually defined by language rather than political boundaries

The technique of getting a commitment from a potential customer and then changing the terms of the agreement is best described as low-balling. cognitive dissonance. reciprocal concession. the foot-in-the-door technique. a half-dozen high school students are going to a concert. chantal wants to wear a new colorful outfit that she just received as a gift, but she assumes that her five friends will all be wearing nothing but black leather. chantal decides to do likewise, and leaves her colorful outfit in the closet. chantal’s behavior is an example of conformity. resistance. reciprocation wariness. idiosyncrasy credits.