Imagine it’s the year 1700. You’ve just become the monarch of a wealthy and influential kingdom in Europe. You could lead in one of two ways. You could be an absolute monarch who is all-powerful, centralizes rule, and has the final say over all matters of government and society. Or you could choose to limit your rule, meaning that you’d still be the leader of the kingdom, but you’d keep in mind the wishes and consent of your advisers and subjects. Which type of monarch would you be? Explain your choice in 50 to 100 words. What advantages and disadvantages might there be to your leadership style? Why?

panem is a communist totalitarian dictatorship where all the resources and how they are allocated belongs to the capitol. the districts exist only to provide goods and services for the capital and most of the citizens live in poverty. it is a police state where the "peacekeepers" use force and threats to keep the people under control. dissent is outlawed and those who disobey the law are executed, flogged, or turned into avoxes. the games are another means in which the ruling elite in the capitol exert their power over the districts. when reading the books i drew parallels between panem and the soviet union and north korea. in no way is panem capitalist. the people in the capitol are wealthy but the majority of them are involved in the government somehow. it was the same way in the former soviet union where bigwigs in the communist party and high ranking government officials were given access to goods, services, medical treatments not available to the general public. if you think panem has a capitalist economy you need to brush up on your economics.  

answer; cindy crawford tina feycarrie underwood///meryl streep;

answer; (b) knowledge based summaries of our beliefs and feeling about the self in particular domains;