Write a four-paragraph argument for or against the usefulness of the feudalist structure. your assigned audience is a modern business leader. you may choose to create a slide show or other piece of media to accompany your paper. for your research, choose one of the following countries: france england germany make a claim as to whether feudalism or hindered your western european country. offer the reader strong points supporting your answer. address the counter claim to your argument. offer the reader the specific facts from your research that shows the flaws within the counter claim. as support for either your claim or counter claim, include how feudalism finished its course in the country you selected. include the approximate years when feudalism began and ended in that country. in addition, explain whether the national leader at the time of feudalism played a part in encouraging or harming feudalism within their country.

Feudalism began with people joining together in response to problems like these, danger from foreign invaders, the lack of a common currency or trade, and food shortages. So therefore they created a "system" called the Feudal System that would help them.

In most of medieval Europe, society was dependent on the feudal system, which was when a king or lord ruled large areas of land. To protect his land from attacks, the king gave parts of it to local lords, who were called vassals. In return, his vassals promised to fight to defend the king's land. If people wanted safety and defense, they had to live in a manor. People in the middle ages created small communities around a king or a lord. Most people lived in a manor, which consisted of a castle, a church, a village, a mill, and the surrounding farmland. These manors were isolated with huge walls, with rare visits from outsiders like merchants. Each manor was self-sufficient, which means that they made everything them selves, like food, clothes, and weapons. Self-sufficiency was very important in these days, because if they weren't able to grow food for them selves, there was no other way for them to get it.

The feudal system worked fine, because everyone had what they wanted and needed such as protection and food. For a peasant it was a very harsh life, if they were born there, they would probably stay there their whole life. Peasants had no rights to do anything except working for their lord, they paid very much for the right to live and grow crops on the lord's land.

where is the rest of the question. this isn't making sense. can you upload a picture of the question?

answer; the trial de novo