After returning from her vacation in hawaii, your cousin apologizes for forgetting the time difference and calling while you were asleep. you're very puzzled by her comment because you have no recollection of the phone conversation. the phone conversation most likely occurred while you were experiencing:

Question 12 chach os) (amencan money lo 4 hc which of the following scenarios would be most likely to cause a small bank to be less willing to loan money to small businesses in a community? or the bank cannot sell the loan to some other bank at the bank cannot make profit on the loan ut the customer has too much in savings in the community cannot grow from the loan

The romans believed every human being deserved rights, even slaves. true or false

Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.