As the map illustrates, africa is exceedingly rich in natural resources, chiefly precious metals and oil. a significant part of the continent makes its money on diamonds, gold or oil.

how does this map relate to the distribution of natural resources for countries such as nigeria?

a) nigeria has no natural resources. they need to develop industry and import raw materials in order to export finished goods.
b) nigeria is rich in gold and diamonds, and they need to learn to mine these resources effectively in order to trade for other resources from other african countries.
c) nigeria has many natural resources; however, they are land-locked and need to effectively work with other nations to move natural resources through other countries for exporting.
d) nigeria is rich in oil and natural gas, and they need to drill for petroleum products effectively and develop refineries in order to trade for other resources from other african countries.

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.

answer; the above statement is (false);

answer; the negotiator was not in full control of his or her actions and hence should not be held responsible;