Frank was seen laughing inappropriately in the library as if he was responding to internal stimuli. on the bus home, he was crying uncontrollably and suddenly became angered when a fellow passenger offered him a tissue. his excess of inappropriate behavior is known as:

Which choice analyzes the parts of the word and determines the meaning of the word spectator

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.

1. describe at least 3 similarities or differences between homo habilis and australopithecus 2. describe at least 3 similarities or differences between cro-magnon and neanderthals.