Unlike the british in south africa, the french government justified their own intervention in mid-19th century indochina
a. by claiming it was to protect catholic religious missions.
b. by claiming it was to protect their diamond mines there.
c. in order to reclaim lands lost in world war i.
d. in order to stop the spread of communism.

What occurred during the free banking era? the dollar bill was introduced. the second bank of the united states was established. repaying of loans was not closely monitored. currency varied widely from state to state.

35 points pls fast. in a citizens elect the president as head of government separately from the legislature. question 1 options: parliamentary democracy communist state presidential democracy autocratic state question 2 (1 point) this form of government has only a single political party. question 2 options: communist democratic autocratic parliamentary question 3 (1 point) this is a government controlled by one person with absolute power. question 3 options: communist democratic autocratic parliamentary question 4 (1 point) a government is a government system where all citizens that choose to vote have a say in their government. question 4 options: communist democratic autocratic theocracy question 5 (1 point) in a the people elect the legislature, and the legislature chooses the head of government. question 5 options: parliamentary democracy communist state presidential democracy autocratic state

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.