subject
Social Studies, 27.08.2019 12:30 ayani144

Which statement accurately explains the key difference between the divine right of kings and a constitutional government
a. the divine right of kings and a constitutional government are based on the idea that leaders are chosen by god and are therefore legitimate
b. the divine right of kings ensures that the monarch will answer to the parliament, while a constitutional government ensures that the parliament will answer to a monarch.
c. neither a constitutional government nor the divine right of kings acknowledges the concept of legitimacy of government.
d. the divine right of kings is the belief that a government has legitimacy because it is chosen by god, while a constitutional government has legitimacy because it is bound by the rule of law.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 21:30
Is there such a thing as a social structure that constrains individual action, or is society nothing more than a figment of our imaginations?
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 12:00
Why learning about people and places around is important?
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 21:50
Cooperation among oligopolies runs counter to the public interest because it leads to underproduction and high prices. in an effort to bring resource allocation closer to the social optimum, public officials attempt to force oligopolies to compete instead of cooperating. consider the following scenario: suppose that the presidents of two auto manufacturing companies exchange text messages in which they discuss jointly raising prices on their new lines of hybrid suvs. this illegal communication would violate which of the following laws? the sherman antitrust act of 1890 the robinson–patman act of 1936 the celler–kefauver act of 1950 the clayton act of 1914
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 02:20
Voters commonly condemn politicians for being insincere, but politicians often must disguise their true feelings when they make public statements. if they expressed their honest views—about, say, their party's policies—then achieving politically necessary compromises would be much more difficult. clearly, the very insincerity that people decry shows that our government is functioning well. which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines this reasoning? (a) achieving political compromises is not all that is necessary for the proper functioning of a government. (b) some political compromises are not in the best long-term interest of the government. (c) voters often judge politicians by criteria other than the sincerity with which they express their views. (d) a political party's policies could turn out to be detrimental to the functioning of a government. (e) some of the public statements made by politicians about their party's policies could in fact be sincere.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Which statement accurately explains the key difference between the divine right of kings and a const...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 08.07.2019 22:00
Questions on the website: 13722367