How do the territorial boundaries correspond with the modern state borders?

The United States underwent territorial expansion between 1790 and 1850. This resulted in a transformation in the borders of the country, where the territorial boundaries of the United States corresponded to the borders of modern states.

Explanation:

The United States government claimed that it was necessary to expand the country to the west, the further the expansion proceeded the more the country prospered. Based on this concept was made the purchase of Louisiana which resulted in the increase of the national territory. At the same time, the settlers were facing resistance from the natives in Oklahoma because they also wanted to take possession of that territory. Given this scenario, the US government established that a portion of the territory would be given to all citizens who worked and left the produce land (in the midst of indigenous hostility), this also helped to expand the national territory. Finally, California's golden fever also influenced the country's expansion. Thus, it is true to say that the national borders of the United States corresponded to the borders of modern states resulting from territorial expansion.

the answer would be in this answer. someone already asked the question.  

the anti federalists was a movement that was opposed to the creation of a us federal government. although they were not as organized as the federalists, they also had a large group of leaders, especially in state politics.

the statement "now, in a large extended country, it is impossible to have a representation, possessing the sentiments, and of integrity, to declare the minds of the people” represents the concerns of the anti federalists.

they strongly believed that the federalists were representing the interests of aristocratic elements of society at the expense of the majority of ordinary people, who lived in a rural society.

their fear for the creation of a strong federal government and the president’s power of veto in their opinion would create a tyrannical rule that would dominate the people. they defended the importance of restraining the government’s power towards people at any cost.