True or false: terrorists usually avoid tourist locations since they are not dod-related.

  False

Explanation:  Terrorists usually choose places with a large number of people, and often places with tourists, for their targets. Given that terrorists use extreme ways to achieve their goals, places with tourists which are attacked can cause great publicity to the international public. These goals are usually associated with some actions of revenge or a holy war, where they believe that these attacks are the result of the actions of Western imperialists. So it can be said that they often choose places with a large number of tourists as retaliation for some injustice that terrorists feel is being inflicted on them, based on their religious or other reasons.

john social contacted the noble of religous

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.