Social Studies, 25.11.2019 11:31 andy6128

Does it matter to the babylonians if an action is deliberate or accidental

Answers: 1

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: ejdjsnsb

Law 12 by Chris Seo on Prezi-
Link : https://prezi.com/m/9uagfexw7u2i/law-12/

Under Hammurabi's laws, the distinction between an accident and deliberate action was almost non-existent. ... meaning that they did not care whether a crime was intentional, or accidental .

Answer from: dorothybean

The correct answer to the question: Does it matter to the Babylonians if an action is deliberate or accidental, would be: No, the matter of something being accidental, or deliberate, was not a matter of interest for Babylonian law; rather, what mattered was against who the damage was done, and the seriousness of the damage, to determine proper payment.

Explanation:

The Babylonian empire was not only known for how vast it became, but also for its pretty unique Code of Law, which was known as the Code of Hammurabi. What is of interest here is that the Code was pretty short, and very specific, and it demonstrated that the first, and most important consideration to be had, when judging a situation, was the status of the person being judged, and the type of damage that his/her actions caused to another, as well as the status of the one who had been harmed. It was totally irrelevant if the situation had been accidental or intentional.

Answer from: Quest

the whiskey rebellion was a 1794 uprising of farmers and distillers in western pennsylvania in protest of a whiskey tax enacted by the federal government. opposition to the whiskey tax and the rebellion itself built support for the republicans, which overtook washington's federalist party for power in 1802.oct 30, 2017

brainliest

Answer from: Quest

The ancient egyptians who built the pyramids may have been able to move massive stone blocks across the desert by wetting the sand in front of a contraption built to pull the heavy objects

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 21.06.2019 22:30

Explain the difference between a plurality and a majority in terms of choosing a candidate for a primary

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:00

One way in which the european union encourages trade among countries is through the use of

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 14:20

Amanda reiss was injured at a wedding reception at a private home. amanda tripped over a piece of rebar that was sticking from the end of one portion of a sidewalk leading to the front door. amanda's lawyer believes that the homeowners were aware of the rebar problem and that other guests to the home had tripped over it but not been injured. how can amanda's lawyer get the information about the homeowner's knowledge? a. he cannot because they are not required to talk with amanda's lawyers b. he can depose the homeowners c. he can depose others who have been guests d. both b and c

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 17:10

In writing about her findings in a brazilian shantytown, nancy scheper-hughes’s account of alto do cruzeiro provides a window into the terrible toll of nonconsensual organ harvesting among the poor, as well as how she herself changed over time. how might an anthropologist justify the publication of this ethnographic research when considering the problem of ethnographic authority? a. all of the poor must be given an equal voice, thus polyvocality is justification. b. anthropologists are themselves changed in fieldwork, and so honest reflexivity is justification. c. the horrific conditions made it impossible to ignore, and since she obtained informed consent, this is justification. d. authoritative writing asks us to consider what right we have to report, thus a moral challenge is justification.

Answers: 3

Answer

You know the right answer?

Does it matter to the babylonians if an action is deliberate or accidental...

Questions