you are a judge that is trying a murder case. up until this point there has been only one suspect (suspect a), but new evidence and information show that more than one person was involved in the murder. the evidence shows that this second suspect (suspect b) may have been the one to pull the trigger and commit the heinous crime of murder. how does this new evidence affect suspect a?

The new evidence is considered mitigating circumstances and may reduce the blameworthiness of the Suspect B.

The new evidence is considered aggravating circumstances and may increase the blameworthiness of the Suspect A.

The new evidence is considered aggravating circumstances and may reduce the blameworthiness of Suspect A.

The new evidence is considered mitigating circumstances and may reduce the blameworthiness of the Suspect A.

The fourth one. The new evidence is considered mitigating circumstances and may reduce the blameworthiness of the Suspect A. This is because mitigating circumstances only reduce the severity of the crime. 

Alright so, i got your question but not the rights listed below. can you tell me them? ( somebody don't delete this i'm just asking ; -; )

This is what i found on google “eightin 1997, the mccaughey septuplets were born in carlisle, iowa. multiple births of as many as eight babies have been born alive, the first set on record to the chukwu family in texas in 1998; one died and seven survived. in 2009, a second set, the suleman octuplets, were born in bellflower, california.” i was surprised about this . i don’t want to have that many babies .