How do redlining and racial steering contribute to institutionalized racism? (Respond in at least 3 sentences.)

Redlining, the practice of avoiding fiscal investment in areas with a high minority population, stops any sort of economic progression in that area. If people or companies do not invest in those communities, then their economic deficiencies will not go away and they will continue to struggle. This contributes to institutional racism because it creates a system in which, if you were born in those poor communities, you will have been set up for failure as the lack of investment leads to worse schools, worse public spaces, worse jobs, etc. Racial steering, the practice of steering minorities(typically black) away from wealthy real-estate, creates areas of bad real-estate that only minorities live in. This segregates good housing in good areas like suburbs and nice parts of the cities for only white people, whereas the poorly run and low-value housing go to black people. This contributes to institutional racism because if you are black you were more likely to be born in these poor areas, so you had less wealth coming into the world.

Explanation:

They are both practices that economically discriminate against black and brown minorities as they live in areas with less money put into them, so they have fewer resources as a result.

a.. a conflict between her competing identities.. apex

question - in 1827, john walker, a druggist in a small english town, tipped a splint with sulphur, chlorate of potash, and sulphid of antimony, and rubbed it on sandpaper, and it burst into flame. the druggist had discovered the first friction-chemical match, the kind we use to-day. it is called friction-chemical because it is made by mixing certain chemicals together and rubbing them. although walker's match did not require the bottle of acid, nevertheless it was not a good one. it could be lighted only by hard rubbing, and it sputtered and threw fire in all directions. in a few years, however, phosphorus was substituted on the tip for antimony, and the change worked wonders. the match could now be lighted with very little rubbing, and it was no longer necessary to have sandpaper upon which to rub it. it would ignite when rubbed on any dry surface, and there was no longer any sputtering. this was the phosphorus match, the match with which we are so familiar. according the paragraph what was the benefit of the new phosphorus match? it burst into flame when rubbed on sandpaper. it was made by mixing chemicals. it could be ignited on any dry surface. it threw fire in all directions.

answer - matches required natural chemicals