Describe at least three obstacles/challenges faced by railroad workers. Describe President Abraham Lincoln's involvement in the transcontinental railroad.

Explain how the railroads were funded.

What groups provided labor for the railroads construction? Describe the role of Chinese and Irish workers in the railroads construction.

Explain why Native Americans were angered by the transcontinental railroad.

Identify the places where the Union Pacific and the Central Pacific Railroads began there construction. Where did the two railroads meet?

Why did the government play such a large role in the building of the transcontinental railroad?

Using the map of the railroad located in the article, identify the body of water that is located near where the Union Pacific and Central Pacific met.

The map shows that the Union Pacific Railroad was able to lay more miles of track than the Central Pacific Railroad. Why do you think that is?

10.Assess the importance of the transcontinental railroad. Why was it important? How did it change the country?

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

hello,

your answer is ready

i believe its either the first or third option but i'm leaning more towards the third option:

the first excerpt makes a logical appeal, while the second excerpt makes an emotional appeal.

your pal

~papaguy

your answer would b. the missisipi river

hope i you : )